Integration of Capillary and NMR Relaxometry Results: From Linear Calibration to Nonlinear 2D Interpretation
https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2026.3.12
Abstract
An approach to interpreting pore size distributions (derived from NMR relaxometry, mercury injection, and porous plate methods) based on a nonlinear transformation (quantile alignment, or quantile mapping) is proposed. Unlike conventional linear calibrations of the form r = cT2 (where r is the pore radius, c is the calibration coefficient, and T2 is the transverse NMR relaxation time), the proposed method accounts for the geometric heterogeneity of the pore space, enabling a closer match with experimental data when reconstructing capillary pressure curves from NMR results. Based on a dataset of 751 core samples, a correlation was established between the nonlinear transformation parameters and the lithological characteristics of the rocks. An interpretation of the r ~ T2 n relationship is proposed, accounting for the link between the pore surface fractal dimension ds and the exponent n. Based on a limited sample set, ranges of ds values for the considered rock types were estimated through pore-space image analysis using the box-counting method. It is shown that the apparent ds values derived from the r(T2 ) dependence are consistent with the ranges determined by the box‑counting method. Using a simple machine learning model (the k-nearest neighbors method) as an example, it is demonstrated that the quality of residual water saturation Swi recovery from NMR relaxometry data using the considered method corresponds to the quality of Swi recovery by the cut-off method when trained on the same dataset, with comparable accuracy of saturation estimation at other capillary pressure stages.
About the Authors
A. G. KhokholkovRussian Federation
Alexey G. Khokholkov – Сand. Sci. (Physics and Mathematics), Senior Engineer of the Laboratory of Petrophysical Core Research
Tyumen
K. A. Kostenevich
Russian Federation
Kristina A. Kostenevich – Head of the Research Group for Lithological and Mineralogical Core Studies of the Laboratory Research Center
Tyumen
V. S. Korytov
Russian Federation
Vitaly S. Korytov – Deputy Director of the Laboratory Research Center
Tyumen
References
1. Anovitz L.M., Cole D.R. (2015). Characterization and Analysis of Porosity and Pore Structures. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 80(1), pp. 61–164. https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2015.80.04
2. Dunn K.-J., Bergman D.J., Latorraca G.A. (2002). Nuclear Magnetic Resonance: Petrophysical and Logging Applications. Pergamon.
3. Katz A. J., Thompson A. H. (1985). Fractal Sandstone Pores: Implications for Conductivity and Pore Formation. Physical Review Letters, 54(12), pp. 1325–1328. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.1325
4. Kleinberg R.L. (1996). Utility of NMR T2 distributions, connection with capillary pressure, clay effect, and determination of the surface relaxivity parameter. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 14(7/8), pp.761–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0730-725X(96)00161-0
5. Larson R.G., Morrow N.R. (1981). Effects of sample size on capillary pressures in porous media. Powder Technology, 30(2), pp. 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(81)80005-8 Li
6. Peng-ju,Gu Yu-feng (2015). Matrix Method of Transforming NMR T2 Spectrum to Pseudo Capillary Pressure Curve[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 26(4), pp. 700–705. https://doi.org/10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2015.04.0700
7. Liu M., Xie R., Xu H., Wu S., Zhu R., & Mao Z. (2018). A New Method for Predicting Capillary Pressure Curves Based on NMR Logging in Tight Sandstone Reservoirs. Applied Magnetic Resonance, 49(10), pp. 1043–1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-018-1024-z
8. Marschall D., Gardner J.S., Mardon D., et al. (1995). Method for correlating NMR relaxometry and mercury injection data. In: International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts. San Francisco, California, USA.
9. McPhee C., Reed J., Zubizarreta I. (2015). Core Analysis: A Best Practice Guide. Elsevier. Mondal I., Singh K.H. (2024). Petrophysical insights into pore structure in complex carbonate reservoirs using NMR data. Petroleum Research, 9(3), pp. 439–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptlrs.2024.03.004
10. Moss A.K., Benson T., Barrow T. (2019). An Investigation into Different Correlation Methods between NMR T2 Distributions and Primary Drainage Capillary Pressure Curves Using an Extensive Sandstone Database. E3S Web of Conferences, 89, 02003. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20198902003
11. Pape H., Riepe L., & Schopper J.R. (1984). The Role of Fractal Quantities, as Specific Surface and Tortuosities, for physical properties of porous media. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization, 1(1–4), pp. 66–73. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.19840010111
12. Pfeifer P., & Avnir D. (1983). Chemistry in noninteger dimensions between two and three. I. Fractal theory of heterogeneous surfaces. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 79(7), pp. 3558–3565. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.446210
13. Purcell W.R. (1949). Capillary Pressures - Their Measurement Using Mercury and the Calculation of Permeability Therefrom. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1(02), pp. 39–48. https://doi.org/10.2118/949039-G
14. Shumskayte M.Y., Glinskikh V.N. (2016). Relation of NMR parameters with specific surface and resistivity of shaly sandstone and siltstone samples: experimental study. Russian Geology and Geophysics, 57(10), pp. 1509–1514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2016.01.019
15. Toporkov V.G., Denisenko A.S. (2008). Practical application of NMR data for assessing properties and structure of rocks in productive oil and gas reservoirs. Karotazhnik, 177, pp. 162–188. (In Russ.)
16. Volokitin Y., Looyestijn W.J., Slijkerman W.F.J., Hofman J.P.(2001). A practical approach to obtain primary drainage capillary pressure curves from NMR core and log data. Petrophysics, 42, pp. 334–343.
17. Wardlaw N.C., McKellar M. (1981). Mercury porosimetry and the interpretation of pore geometry in sedimentary rocks and artificial models. Powder Technology, 29(1), pp. 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(81)85011-5
18. Wu B., Xie R., Xu C., Wei H., Wang S., Liu J. (2021). A new method for predicting capillary pressure curves based on NMR echo data: Sandstone as an example. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 202, 108581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108581
19. Xiao L., Mao Z., Zou C., Jin, Y., & Zhu, J. (2016a). A new methodology of constructing pseudo capillary pressure (Pc) curves from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 147, pp. 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.05.015
20. Xiao L., Zou C.C., Mao Z.Q., Jin Y., Zhu J.C. (2016b) A new technique to synthetize capillary pressure (Pc) curves using NMR Logs in tight gas sandstone reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 145, pp. 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.06.002
21. Zhang Z., Weller A. (2014). Fractal dimension of pore-space geometry of an Eocene sandstone formation. Geophysics, 79(6), D377–D387. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2014-0143.1
Review
For citations:
Khokholkov A.G., Kostenevich K.A., Korytov V.S. Integration of Capillary and NMR Relaxometry Results: From Linear Calibration to Nonlinear 2D Interpretation. Georesursy = Georesources. 2026;28(3):67-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2026.3.12
JATS XML









.png)