Preview

Georesources

Advanced search

Experience in research and injection of flue gases into oil fields to increase oil recovery

https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2022.3.13

Abstract

Decreasing negative impact of industrial emissions to the atmosphere and prolonging fossil fuel usage period are urgent issues of fuel and energy sector. In view of this problem, injection of flue gases into oil fields to increase oil recovery may be considered as environmentally safe and economically rational way for beneficial use of greenhouse gas emissions. To effectively displace oil with flue gases it is important to consider many factors: influence of composition of the flue gases and oil, miscibility conditions, injection regimes, etc. Flue gases, a product of fuel combustion in air, can be produced as a result of oil self-ignition when air is injected into a reservoir with light oil (thermal gas method). Flue gases from natural gas, fuel oil or coal combustion in power plants or other processes that burn fossil fuels can also be used for injection into the reservoir. This paper presents an analysis of the world laboratory and industrial experience in studying efficiency of oil displacement using flue gases. Conclusions are presented about optimal criteria for implementation of this process and directions for further research.

About the Authors

C. A. Garifullina
Almetyevsk State Oil Institute
Russian Federation

Chulpan A. Garifullina – Research Engineer

2, Lenin st., Almetyevsk, 423450



T. F. Khaliullin
Almetyevsk State Oil Institute
Russian Federation

Timur F. Khaliullin – Laboratory Engineer

2, Lenin st., Almetyevsk, 423450



I. M. Indrupskiy
Oil and Gas Research Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Ilya M. Indrupskiy – Dr. Sci. (Engineering), Head of the Laboratory

3, Gubkin st., Moscow, 119333



I. V. Valiullin
Almetyevsk State Oil Institute
Russian Federation

Ilsur V. Valiullin – Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Leading Researcher

2, Lenin st., Almetyevsk, 423450



A. A. Zalyatdinov
Almetyevsk State Oil Institute
Russian Federation

Albert A. Zalyatdinov – Head of the Center

2, Lenin st., Almetyevsk, 423450



E. A. Burlutskiy
Almetyevsk State Oil Institute
Russian Federation

Efim A. Burlutskiy – Engineer

2, Lenin st., Almetyevsk, 423450



R. Kh. Sadreeva
Almetyevsk State Oil Institute
Russian Federation

Rauza Kh. Sadreeva – Head of the Laboratory

2, Lenin st., Almetyevsk, 423450



R. R. Aflyatunov
Tatneft PJSC
Russian Federation

Rinat R. Aflyatunov – Chief Geologist, Deputy General Director

75a, Lenin st., Almetyevsk, 423450



I. Kh. Kashapov
Tatneft-Dobycha Tatneft PJSC
Russian Federation

Ildar Kh. Kashapov – Deputy Head of the Development Department of the Elkhov-Prikamskaya and Bavlinskaya Territories

75, Lenin st., Almetyevsk, 423450



References

1. d economic feasibility study of flue gas injection in an Iranian oil field. Petroleum, 1(3), pp. 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2015.07.010

2. Al Riyami M. (2017). Evaluation of Compositional Effects on Gas-Oil Miscibility and Gas-Assisted Gravity Drainage (GAGD) EOR Process. LSU Doctoral Dissertation.

3. Antoniadi D.G. (1998). Increased oil recovery by gas and steam-gas methods. Moscow.

4. Dong M., Huang S. (2002). Flue Gas Injection for Heavy Oil Recovery. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 41(9). https://doi.org/10.2118/02-09-04

5. Final report of Fossil Energy. State-of-the-art review of nitrogen and flue gas flooding in enhanced oil recovery (1980). Morgantown, West Verginia, Vol. 133. https://doi.org/10.2172/6813742

6. Godwin Jh. et al. (1998). A Small Independent Producer’s Design, Construction and Operation of a Flue Gas Injection Project, East Edna Field, Okmulgee County, Oklahoma. SPE/DOE Eleventh Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery. Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

7. Gorbyleva Ya.A. (2021). On the technology of injection of exhaust (flue) gases for oil recovery. Vestnik Evraziiskoi nauki, 13(4). (In Russ.) https://esj.today/PDF/08SAVN421.pdf

8. Kozlov V.B. (2004). A set of technical and technological solutions for optimizing the thermal impact on deep-lying deposits of high-viscosity oil (on the example of the Permocarbon deposit of the Usinskoye oil field). Cand. engineer. sci. diss. Ukhta. (In Russ.)

9. Likhacheva N.V., Khristoforov D.O., Khlebnikova T.D. et al. (2020). Burial of greenhouse gases in geological traps in order to intensify oil and gas production. Problems of collection, preparation and transport of oil and oil products, 6, pp. 116-124. (In Russ.)

10. Monte-Mor L.S., Laboissière P., Trevisan O.V. (2013). Laboratory Study on Steam and Flue Gas Co-injection for Heavy Oil Recovery. SPE Heavy Oil Conference. Canada, Calgary, Alberta. SPE-165523-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/199949-MS

11. Qingya Liu, Zhenyu Liu, Weize Wu. (2009). Effect of V2O5 additive on simultaneous SO2 and NO removal from flue gas over a monolithic cordierite‑based CuO/Al2O3 catalyst. Catalysis Today, pp. S285-S289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.cattod.2009.07.013

12. Rivera J.E. et al. (2010). Experimental Evaluation of the Flue-Gas Injection of Barrancabermeja Refinery as EOR Method. SPE International Conference on CO2 Capture, Storage, and Utilization. New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. SPE-139715. https://doi.org/10.2118/139715-MS

13. Ryumin A.A., Belonin M.D., Gribkov V.V. (1996). A method for intensifying oil production. Patent RF, no. 2055170 C1. (In Russ.)

14. Salyamov Z.Z., Sharifullina R.Z. et al. (1996). Method for developing an oil field. Patent RF, no. 2055168 C1. (In Russ.)

15. Shchesnyak E., Ryzhkov A., Ledovich I., Osipov A., Musin A. (2019). Disposal of flue gases in oil reservoirs with high-viscosity oil in order to increase oil recovery and improve the environmental situation. E3S Web of Conferences, 116, 00075.

16. Shokoya O. S., Mehata S.A., Moore R.G., Maini B.B. (2005). Effect of CO2 Concentration on Oil Recovery in Enriched Flue Gas Flood. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Dallas, Texas. SPE 97262. https://doi.org/10.2118/97262-MS

17. Trivedi J.J., Babadagli T. (2005). CO and Flue Gas Sequestration During Tertiary Oil Recovery: Optimal Injection Strategies and Importance of Operational Parameters. Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta. https://doi.org/10.2118/2005-042

18. Trofimov A.S., Kruglov I.A., Berdnikov S.V. (2012). Water-gas treatment using finely dispersed hydrocarbon gas. Proc. 8th All-Russ. sci. and tech. conf.: Geology and oil and gas potential of the West Siberian megabasin (experience, innovations). Tyumen: TIU, pp. 55-60. (In Russ.)

19. Wang Z. (2017). Research on enhancing heavy oil recovery mechanism of flue gas assisted steam flooding. CMTC-486093-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.7122/486093-MS

20. Wang Z.-H., Sun B.-W., Guo P. et al. (2021). Investigation of flue gas water-alternating gas (flue gas–WAG) injection for enhanced oil recovery and multicomponent flue gas storage in the post-waterflooding reservoir. Petroleum Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-021-00548-z

21. Zong L., Dong Z., Hou J. et al. (2013). Investigation on Principles of Enhanced Offshore Heavy Oil Recovery by Coinjection of Steam with Flue Gas. SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. SPE-165231-MS.


Review

For citations:


Garifullina C.A., Khaliullin T.F., Indrupskiy I.M., Valiullin I.V., Zalyatdinov A.A., Burlutskiy E.A., Sadreeva R.Kh., Aflyatunov R.R., Kashapov I.Kh. Experience in research and injection of flue gases into oil fields to increase oil recovery. Georesursy = Georesources. 2022;24(3):149-163. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2022.3.13

Views: 256


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1608-5043 (Print)
ISSN 1608-5078 (Online)