Applying the Automated Depth-Shifting Workflow of Well Logging Data and Whole Core Images for Carbonate vs Clastic Rocks
https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2025.4.4
Abstract
This paper describes a novel approach for automatic depth shifting geophysical well logs data and whole core images. The proposed approach combines the use of machine learning algorithms for automatic lithotype description via whole core images and an amplitude modal inversion algorithm, enabling the integration of stratigraphic information during the shifting process. The automatic shifting with whole core images is performed without using the natural gamma radiation curve of drill core or core routine data. As part of this study, the proposed workflow was validated on clastic and carbonate datasets (including non-clayey carbonates rocks) for neutron and density logs. The automatic shifting results have high accuracy, with precision equal to that of the smoothing filter (approximately 60 cm for neutron logs and 80 cm for density logs.), according to the analysis of the processed data and comparison with core routine data. The proposed technique significantly reduces the time required for processing well logging data compared to traditional approaches, minimizes errors related to human factors, and can serve as a foundation for further research in this area.
About the Authors
G. A. Kossov
LLC "STISS"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Georgy A. Kossov – Researcher
Build. 3, 16a, Leningradskoe shosse, Moscow, 125171
V. V. Abashkin
LLC "STISS"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Abashkin – Cand. Sci. (Physics and Mathematics), Project Manager
Build. 3, 16a, Leningradskoe shosse, Moscow, 125171
D. M. Ezersky
LLC "STISS"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitry M. Ezersky – Petrophysicist, GWL Data Processing and Interpretation Department
Build. 3, 16a, Leningradskoe shosse, Moscow, 125171
References
1. Abashkin V.V., Seleznev I.A., Chertova A.A., Istomin S.B., Romanov D.V., Samokhvalov A.F. (2020). Quantitative analysis of whole core photos for continental oilfield of Western Siberia. SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference, OnePetro. https://doi.org/10.2118/202017-MS
2. Abdi H., Williams L.J. (2010). Principal component analysis. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. WIREs Computational Statistics, 2, pp. 433–459. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.101
3. Allen D.F., Bordakov G.A. (2009). Method for quantifying resistivity and hydrocarbon saturation in thin bed formations. U.S. Patent No. 7,617,050.
4. Bordakov G.A., Kliegl M.V., Goswami J.C. (2015). Robust Well Log Sharpening With Unknown Tool Response Function. U.S. Patent Application No. 14/151,687. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20141285
5. Damaschke M., Fellgett M., Howe M., Watson C. (2023). Unlocking national treasures: The core scanning approach. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 527, SP527-2022. https://doi.org/10.1144/sp527-2022-58
6. Felinger A. (1998). Data analysis and signal processing in chromatography. Elsevier, 414 p.
7. Kerzner M.G. (1984). A solution to the problem of automatic depth matching. SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium, SPWLA, SPWLA-1984.
8. Kossov G., Abashkin V. (2024). A method for automatic depth shifting of geophysicals well logs with whole core images. Geophysics, 3, pp. 46–52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34926/geo.2024.94.33.006
9. Kossov G., Abashkin V., Ezersky D. (2024). Automated workflow for depth-shifting GWL curves to the drill core images. Proceedings of the VII International Geological and Geophysical Conference. (In Russ.)
10. Kuznetsova G. (2017). Methodological techniques for depth-shifting of the drill core to geophysical logs. Territoriya Neftegaz, pp. 20–26. (In Russ.)
11. Massart D.L. (1988). Data handling in science and technology. Chemometrics, 488 p.
12. Petersillier V., Poroskun V., Yatsenko G. (2003). Methodological recommendations for calculating geological reserves of oil and gas. MoscowTver, 258 p. (In Russ.)
13. Seleznev I., Abashkin V., Chertova A., Istomin S., Samokhvalov A., Romanov D. (2019). Quantitative Analysis of Whole Core Images. Geomodel 2019, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201950103
14. Seleznev I., Abashkin V., Chertova A., Makienko D., Istomin S., Romanov D., Samokhvalov A. (2020). Joint Usage of Whole Core Images Obtained in Different Frequency Ranges for the Tasks of Automatic Lithotype Description and Modeling of Rocks’ Petrophysics Properties. Geomodel 2020, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202050090
15. Słota-Valim M., Lis-Śledziona A. (2021). The Use of Well-Log Data in the Geomechanical Characterization of Middle Cambrian Tight Sandstone Formation: A Case Study from Eastern Pomerania, Poland. Energies, 14, 6022. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196022
16. Suarez-Rivera R., Edelman E., Handwerger D., Hakami A., Gathogo P. (2012). Improving geologic core descriptions and heterogeneous rock characterization via continuous profiles of core properties. SPWLA Annual Logging Symposium, SPWLA, SPWLA-2012.
17. Tabanou J.R., Antoine J. (1995). Method and apparatus for detecting and quantifying hydrocarbon bearing laminated reservoirs on a workstation. U.S. Patent No. 5,461,562.
18. Torres Caceres V.A., Duffaut K., Yazidi A., Westad F.O., Johansen Y.B. (2022). Automated well-log depth matching–1d convolutional neural networks vs. classic cross correlation. Petrophysics, 63, pp. 12–34. https://doi.org/10.30632/PJV63N1-2022a2
19. Zimmermann T., Liang L., Zeroug S. (2018). Machine-learning-based automatic well-log depth matching. Petrophysics, 59, pp. 863–872. https://doi.org/10.30632/PJV59N6-2018a10
Review
For citations:
Kossov G.A., Abashkin V.V., Ezersky D.M. Applying the Automated Depth-Shifting Workflow of Well Logging Data and Whole Core Images for Carbonate vs Clastic Rocks. Georesursy = Georesources. 2025;27(4):59-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2025.4.4
Views:
970
JATS XML
.png){kind=logo}
Email this article 