Efficiency estimation of super-viscous oil recovery by in-situ catalytic upgrading in cyclic steam stimulation: from laboratory screening to numerical simulation
https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2023.4.7
Abstract
This article describes a method of predicting super-viscous oil deposit development performance by catalytic aquathermolysis process in cycling steam simulation (CSS). This technology involves the injection of an oilsoluble catalyst into the reservoir after several cycles of steam injection and oil production. According to the results of laboratory studies, the effect of catalytic oil upgrading in the reservoir is expressed in non-instantaneous reduction in oil viscosity and increase in sweep efficiency. To assess the effectiveness of the technology on the field-scale thermal numerical simulation model, based on the results of laboratory studies, is used. The oil upgrading process is represented in the model by the oil upgrading reaction and dependence of oil viscosity and residual oil saturation on the degree of oil upgrading. The kinetic parameters of the reaction and the properties of the converted oil are adjusted according to the results of experiments in a high-pressure reactor and tube tests.
Field scale numerical simulation resulted in dependance of catalytic upgrading efficiency on the uniformity of well temperature profile, presence of residual oil and reservoir properties at the effective wellbore radius. It is shown that the effect of catalytic upgrading on a CSS well is determined not only by physical and chemical changes in oil composition but also by adsorption properties of the catalyst itself, heating the wellbore region and matrix and fracture interaction in reservoir. According to simulation results, choosing an optimal catalytic volume and injection scenario allows the recovery of up to 25% of additional oil, that reveals good perspectives of improving steam-based technologies by in-situ catalytic upgrading.
About the Authors
R. E. SafinaRussian Federation
Regina E. Safina – Engineer
4, Bolshaya Krasnaya st., Kazan, 420111
S. A. Usmanov
Russian Federation
Sergey A. Usmanov – Senior Lecturer
4, Bolshaya Krasnaya st., Kazan, 420111
I. F. Minkhanov
Russian Federation
Ilgiz F. Minkhanov – Senior Lecturer
4, Bolshaya Krasnaya st., Kazan, 420111
I. I. Mukhamatdinov
Russian Federation
Irek I. Mukhamatdinov – Cand. Sci. (Technology), Senior Researcher
1/29, Lobachevskogo st., Kazan, 420111
Ya. O. Simakov
Russian Federation
Yaroslav O. Simakov – Head of Research and Development Center, EOR Department
10, Dmitrovsky pr., Moscow, 127422
V. A. Vakhin
Russian Federation
Alexey V. Vakhin – Cand. Sci. (Technology), Senior Researcher
1/29, Lobachevskogo st., Kazan, 420111
V. A. Sudakov
Russian Federation
Vladislav A. Sudakov – Head of Research Educational Center “Hard-to-Recover Reserves Simulation”
4, Bolshaya Krasnaya st., Kazan, 420111
M. A. Varfolomeev
Russian Federation
Mikhail A. Varfolomeev – Cand. Sci. (Chemistry), Head of the Department of Development and Operation of Hardto-Recover Hydrocarbon Deposits
4/5, Kremlevskaya st., Kazan, 420111
D. K. Nurgaliev
Russian Federation
Danis K. Nurgaliev – Dr. Sci. (Geology and Mineralogy), Vice-Rector for Petroleum Technologies, Environmental management and Earth Science
7, Chernyshevskogo st., Kazan, 420111
References
1. Alonso-Ramírez G. et al. (2018). Analysis of the thermal hydrocracking of heavy fuel oil. Petroleum Science and Technology, 36(7), pp. 507–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/10916466.2018.1428627
2. Alonso-Ramírez G. et al. (2021). Catalytic hydrocracking of a Mexican heavy oil on a MoS2/al2o3catalyst: II. Study of the transformation of isolated aromatics fraction obtained from SARA analysis. Fuel, 288, pp. 119541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119541
3. Anikin, O.V., Bolotov, A.V., Minkhanov, I.F. et al. (2022). Factors influencing hydrogen peroxide decomposition dynamics for thermochemical treatment of bottomhole zone. J Petrol Explor Prod Technol, (12), pp. 2587–2598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-022-01507-z
4. Askarova A. et al. (2020). Thermal enhanced oil recovery in deep heavy oil carbonates: Experimental and numerical study on a hot water injection performance. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 194, 107456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107456
5. Bueno Zapata N., Morales Mora O.A., Mejía Cárdenas J.M. (2019). Practical kinetic coupling to multi-component and multi-phase flow transport during in-situ heavy oil upgrading processes using an equation of statebased numerical reservoir simulation. SPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, UAE. https://doi.org/10.2118/196667-MS
6. Kudryashov S.I., Afanasiev I.S., Solovyev A.V., Petrashov O.V., Sansiev G.V., Dubrovin K.A., Volik А.I.;, Simakov Ia.O., Vakhin A.V., Mukhamatdinov I.I., Sitnov S.A., Minkhanov I.F.; Varfolomeev M.A., Bolotov A.V., Nourgaliev D.K. (2022). Application of catalytic aquathermolysis technology in Boca de Jaruco oilfield: spotlight from theory to field test. Neftyanoe khozyaystvo = Oil Industry, (9), pp. 37–41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24887/0028-2448-2022-9-37-41
7. Maity S.K., Ancheyta J., Marroquín G. (2010). Catalytic aquathermolysis used for viscosity reduction of heavy crude oils: A review. Energy & Fuels, 24(5), pp. 2809–2816. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef100230k
8. Minkhanov I.F., Chalin V.V., Tazeev A.R., Bolotov A.V., Mukhamatdinov I.I. et al. (2023). Integrated Modeling of the Catalytic Aquathermolysis Process to Evaluate the Efficiency in a Porous Medium by the Example of a Carbonate Extra-Viscous Oil Field. Catalysts, 13(2), p. 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13020283
9. Minkhanov I.F., Bolotov A.V., Al-Muntaser A., Mukhamatdinov I., Vakhin A., Varfolomeev M. (2021). Experimental study on the improving the efficiency of oil displacement by co-using of the steam-solvent catalyst. Neftyanoe khozyaystvo = Oil Industry, (6), pp. 54–57. https://doi.org/10.24887/0028-2448-2021-6-54-57
10. Morrow, A.W., Mukhametshina, A., Aleksandrov, D., Hascakir B. (2014).Environmental Impact of Bitumen Extraction with Thermal Recovery. SPE Heavy Oil Conference-Canada, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. https://doi.org/10.2118/170066-MS
11. Nazarova G.Y. et al. (2021). A model of catalytic cracking: Product distribution and catalyst deactivation depending on saturates, aromatics and resins content in feed. Catalysts, 11(6), p. 701. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11060701
12. Tirado A. et al. (2022). Kinetic modeling of aquathermolysis for upgrading of heavy oils. Fuel, 310, 122286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122286
13. Vakhin A.V., Aliev F.A., Mukhamatdinov I.I., Sitnov S.A., Kudryashov S.I., Afanasiev I.S., Petrashov O.V., Nurgaliev D.K. (2021). Extra-heavy Oil Aquathermolysis Using Nickel-based Catalyst: Some Aspects of in-situ Transformation of Catalyst Precursor. Catalysts, 11(2), 189, pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11020189
14. Vakhin А.V., Aliev F.A., Mukhamatdinov I.I., Sitnov S.A., Pyataev A.V., Kudryashov S.I., Afanasiev I.S., Solovev A.V., Sansiev G.V., Antonenko D.A. et al. (2023). Catalytic activity of bimetallic nanoparticles based on iron and nickel sulfides for hydrogenolysis of heavy oil in case of Boca de Jaruco reservoir. Molecular catalysis, 546, 113261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2023.113261
15. Vakhin A.V., Mukhamatdinov I.I., Aliev F., Feoktistov D., Sitnov S.A., Gafurov M., Minkhanov I.F., Varfolomeev M.A., Nourgaliev D.K., Simakov Ia.O., Latypov A., Petrashov O., Solovev A., Sansiev G. (2021). Industrial Application of Nickel Tallate Catalyst During Cyclic Steam Stimulation in Boca De Jaruco Reservoir. SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference. https://doi.org/10.2118/206419-MS
Review
For citations:
Safina R.E., Usmanov S.A., Minkhanov I.F., Mukhamatdinov I.I., Simakov Ya.O., Vakhin V.A., Sudakov V.A., Varfolomeev M.A., Nurgaliev D.K. Efficiency estimation of super-viscous oil recovery by in-situ catalytic upgrading in cyclic steam stimulation: from laboratory screening to numerical simulation. Georesursy = Georesources. 2023;25(4):106-114. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2023.4.7