Challenges and responses of the economy of the Republic of Tatarstan to decarbonization processes
https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2021.3.3
Abstract
The processes of global energy transition are increasingly becoming one of the main driving forces of both the transformation of the existing market model and the technological foundations of the functioning of energy facilities. The reorientation of the world economy towards decarbonization threatens the stability of the functioning of many previously seemingly unshakable technological solutions and approaches in the field of system integration of the fuel and energy complex, which, in turn, stimulates the search for a new paradigm of its development.
The manifestations of transformation are observed at various levels of the economic hierarchy: inter-country, country and intra-country. The development of mechanisms for the response of Russian manufacturers to the realities of the energy transition requires testing at real facilities. According to the authors, Tatarstan can become an indicative region for the development of approaches to achieving carbon neutrality.
For a preventive forecast of the attainability of ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) indicators, the authors propose a conceptual approach to assessing the development of decarbonization technologies, based on a combination of economic and mathematical methods, which allows us to develop an organizational and legal basis for the process, form and evaluate criteria for the effectiveness of innovations and the conditions for their implementation.
Keywords
decarbonization,
energy transition,
innovation assessment,
ecology,
threshold analysis,
Bayesian networks,
learning curves
Supporting agencies: This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, grant no. 19-18-00170.
About the Authors
V. A. Kryukov
Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valeriy A. Kryukov – DSc (Economics), Professor, Director
17, Aс. Lavrentiev ave., Novosibirsk, 630090
D. V. Milyaev
Siberian Scientific Research Institute of Geology, Geophysics and Mineral Resources;
Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitriy V. Milyaev – PhD (Economics), Head of the Geological and Economic Analysis Department;
Researcher
67, Krasniy ave., Novosibirsk, 630091
A. D. Savelieva
Siberian Scientific Research Institute of Geology, Geophysics and Mineral Resources;
Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anastasiya D. Savelieva – External PhD student, Engineer;
Engineer
67, Krasniy ave., Novosibirsk, 630091
D. I. Dushenin
Siberian Scientific Research Institute of Geology, Geophysics and Mineral Resources;
Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitriy I. Dushenin – PhD (Physics and Mathematics), Head of the Laboratory of Technical and Economic Assessment of Projects;
Researcher
67 Krasniy ave., Novosibirsk, 630091
References
1. Abdulkareem S.A., Mustafa Y.T., Augustijn E.W., Filatova T. (2019). Bayesian networks for spatial learning: a workflow on using limited survey data for intelligent learning in spatial agent-based models. Geoinformatica, 23, pp.243–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-019-00347-0
2. Anankina E.A. (2021). ESG – three fatal cards for the Russian oil and gas complex. Neftegazovaya vertikal [Oil and gas vertical], 7, pp. 44–49. (In Russ.)
3. Dushenin D., Milyaev D. (2018). Automation of the Analysis of the Efficiency of Geological Exploration for Oil and Gas. In Geomodel 2018 (No. 1, pp. 1–5). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
4. Gaida I.V., Mitrova T.A., et al. (2021). Decarbonization in the oil and gas industry: international experience and Russia’s priorities. Skolkovo Energy Centre, 158 p. (In Russ.)
5. Globerson S., Gold D. (2010). Statistical attributes of the power learning curve model. International journal of production research, 35(3), pp. 699–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075497195669
6. Global Energy Transition for Russia – Opportunity or Danger? (2021). Neftegazovaya vertikal [Oil and gas vertical]. (In Russ.). http://www.ngv.ru/pr/globalnyy-energoperekhod-dlya-rossii-vozmozhnost-ili-opasnost-institutrazvitiya-tekhnologiy-tek-obr/?sphrase_id=3273313
7. Russia’s Climate Agenda: Responding to International Challenges (2021). (In Russ.). https://www.csr.ru/ru/news/klimaticheskaya-povestkarossii-reagiruya-na-mezhdunarodnye-vyzovy/
8. Kryukov V.A., Gorlov A.A. (2019). Forecasting the Development Process of Wind Energy in the North Sea Basin Based on Learning Curves. Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev., 30, pp. 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700719020084
9. Milyaev D.V., Kidanova O.A., Dushenin D.I. (2017). Determination of threshold values for the solution of the multiparametric problem of assessing the efficiency of geological exploration. Mathematics in the Modern World, pp. 567–567.
10. Poryadin A.E., Beloglazova O. (2021). Global decarbonization: the evolution of approaches of oil and gas companies. Ernst&Young. (In Russ.). https://www.ey.com/ru_ru/oil-gas/global-decarbonizationevolution-of-oil-and-gas-companies-approaches/
11. Safonov G.V. (2020). Decarbonization of the world economy and Russia. Neftegazovaya vertikal [Oil and gas vertical], 21–22, pp. 66–70. (In Russ.)
12. Yelle L.E. (1979). The learning curve: Historical review and comprehensive survey. Decision Sciences, 10, pp. 302–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1979.tb00026.x
Review
For citations:
Kryukov V.A., Milyaev D.V., Savelieva A.D., Dushenin D.I. Challenges and responses of the economy of the Republic of Tatarstan to decarbonization processes. Georesursy = Georesources. 2021;23(3):17-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2021.3.3
Views:
110
.png){kind=logo}
Email this article 