On the relationship of Poisson’s ratio with geophysical characteristics of rocks
https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2024.2.7
Abstract
Currently, there are no reliable universal dependencies of the Poisson’s ratio on the geomechanical and geophysical characteristics of productive objects. This study aims to investigate the influence of geophysical parameters on the Poisson’s ratio for oilfield productive objects using machine learning methods. The analysis is based on data from several oil and gas fields, presenting results of dependencies between the Poisson’s ratio and parameters such as natural radioactivity of rocks and P-wave velocity. The elastic parameters were identified through triaxial tests of rock samples under reservoir conditions conducted on the PIK-UIDK/PL triaxial system at Perm National Research Polytechnic University. A brief overview of existing standards for conducting triaxial tests is also provided. The importance of standardizing methods for determining the Poisson’s ratio and other elastic parameters of rocks is emphasized to ensure comparability of research results from different fields and their applicability in various geological conditions. The proposed data analysis method relies on linear regression and machine learning methods to establish stable relationships between the Poisson’s ratio and geophysical parameters obtained from various well logging studies. These dependencies allow for more accurate estimation of the Poisson’s ratio for different types of rocks and fields, representing a significant step in developing methods for assessing elastic properties of rocks in oil fields. The obtained results can be used for more precise modeling and forecasting of oil field development processes, contributing to increased efficiency in hydrocarbon extraction and optimization of production processes in the oil industry.
About the Authors
D. V. ShustovRussian Federation
Denis V. Shustov – Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Associate Professor, Leading Researcher
29, Komsomolsky pr., Perm, 614990
Yu. A. Kashnikov
Russian Federation
Yurii A. Kashnikov – Dr. Sci. (Engineering), Professor, Head of Mine Surveying, Geodesy and Geographic Information Systems Department
29, Komsomolsky pr., Perm, 614990
A. E. Kukhtinskii
Russian Federation
Artem E. Kukhtinskii – Senior Researcher
29, Komsomolsky pr., Perm, 614990
A. A. Efimov
Russian Federation
Artyom A. Efimov – Cand. Sci. (Geology and Mineralogy), Senior Researcher
29, Komsomolsky pr., Perm, 614990
References
1. Asoodeh M. (2013). Prediction of Poisson’s Ratio from Conventional Well Log Data: A Committee Machine with Intelligent Systems Approach. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 35(10), pp. 962–975. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2011.557693
2. ASTM D3967-16. Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of intact rock core specimens. (2023). ASTM, Vol. 04.08, 5 p. https://doi. org/10.1520/D3967-16
3. ASTM D7012-14e1. Standard test method for compressive strength and elastic moduli of intact rock core specimens under varying states of stress and temperatures. (2023). ASTM, Vol. 04.09, 9 p. https://doi.org/10.1520/D7012-14E01
4. Gowida A., Elkatatny S., Moussa T. (2020). Comparative Analysis Between Different Artificial Based Models for Predicting Static Poisson’s Ratio of Sandstone Formations. International Petroleum Technology Conference, IPTC-20208-MS. https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-20208-MS
5. Jizba D., Nur A. (1990). Static and dynamic moduli of tight gas sandstones and their relation to formation properties. SPWLA 31st Annual Logging Symposium, SPWLA-1990-BB.
6. Kashnikov YU.A., Ashihmin S.G. (2019). Rock mechanics in petroleum industry. Moscow: Gornaya kniga, 496 p. (In Russ.)
7. Kashnikov Yu.A., Shustov D.V., Kukhtinskii A.E. (2017). Geomechanical properties of the terrigenous reservoirs in the oil fields of Western Ural. Neftyanoe khozyaystvo = Oil Industry, 4, pp. 32–25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24887/0028-2448-2017-4-32-35
8. King M.S. (1969). Static and dynamic elastic moduli of rocks under pressure. The 11th U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS), ARMA-69-0329.
9. Martin R.J., Haupt R.W. (1994). Static and Dynamic Elastic Moduli in Granite: The Effect of Strain Amplitude. 1st North American Rock Mechanics Symposium, ARMA-1994-0473.
10. Rzhevskiy V.V., Novik G.Ya. (1978). Basis of the rocks physics. Moscow: Nedra, 390 p. (In Russ.)
11. State Standard 21153.8-88 Rocks. Method for determination of triaxial compressive strength (1988). Moscow, 17 p. (In Russ.)
12. State Standard 28985-91. Rocks. Method of determination of deformation characteristics under uniaxial compression (1991). Moscow, 11 p. (In Russ.) Ulusay R. (Ed.) (2015). The ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring: 2007–2014. Springer Cham, XIII, 293 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07713-0
13. Ulusay R., Hudson J.A. (Eds.) (2007). The Complete ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring: 1974–2006. International Society of Rock Mechanics, Commission on Testing Methods, 628 p.
14. Zoback M.D. (2007). Reservoir Geomechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 452 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586477
Review
For citations:
Shustov D.V., Kashnikov Yu.A., Kukhtinskii A.E., Efimov A.A. On the relationship of Poisson’s ratio with geophysical characteristics of rocks. Georesursy = Georesources. 2024;26(2):69–75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2024.2.7