Model of the structure of the Earth’s crust and Upper Mantle along the Middle Ural transect (Based on the results of Volumetric seismic Density Modeling)
https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2024.4.3
Abstract
A geological and geophysical model of the structure of the earth’s crust and upper mantle along the Middle Ural transect is presented (as a vertical section of a three-dimensional seismic density model). The methodology for constructing a 3D density model of the earth’s crust and upper mantle for the Middle Urals is outlined. The model was created based on the results of interpretation of gravity anomalies in the Bouguer reduction and deep seismic sounding data. Creating a volumetric one consists of several stages. At the first stage, gradient velocity sections were constructed in the format of grid functions (2D models of seismic velocity distribution) to a depth of 80 km, which were converted into density ones using refined formulas. Next, a threedimensional zero-approximation density model is constructed (using interpolation methods) and the difference between the observed gravitational field and the field of this model is calculated. For the difference field, the inverse problem is solved the density values at the nodes of the computational grid are determined, which need to be added to the zeroapproximation model in order to satisfy the observed field. A comparison is made of the gradient density section obtained by a vertical section of the author’s volumetric density model of the earth’s crust and upper mantle of the Middle Urals along the line of the Middle Ural transect, with a density model created on the basis of a two-dimensional interpretation along this transect (according to the EUROPROBE program). The cross-section of the volumetric density model reflects the main features of the deep structure of the study area, presented in the two-dimensional model, and supplements them with new data on the distribution of physical parameters in the earth’s crust and mantle. This illustrates the fact that a three-dimensional density model, the construction of which takes into account geophysical data specified over the entire study area, carries more information about the structure of the earth’s crust than two-dimensional models.
About the Authors
P. S. MartyshkoRussian Federation
Petr S. Martyshko – Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Dr. Sci. (Physics and Mathematics), Professor, Head of the Laboratory, Bulashevich Institute of Geophysics.
100 Amundsen st., Yekaterinburg, 620016
D. D. Byzov
Russian Federation
Denis D. Byzov – Cand. Sci. (Physics and Mathematics), Senior Researcher, Bulashevich Institute of Geophysics.
100 Amundsen St., Yekaterinburg, 620016
A. Yu. Osipova
Russian Federation
Anastasiya Yu. Osipova – Cand. Sci. (Geology and Mineralogy), Researcher, Bulashevich Institute of Geophysics.
100 Amundsen St., Yekaterinburg, 620016
References
1. Druzhinin V.S., Martyshko P.S., Nachapkin N.I., Osipov V.Yu. (2014). The structure of the upper part of the lithosphere and the oil and gas content of the subsoil of the Ural region. Yekaterinburg: IGF UrO RAN, 226 p. (In Russ.)
2. Geology and minerals of Russia (2011). V. 1: West of Russia and the Urals. Book 2: Ural. Ed. O.A. Kondiayn. St. Petersburg: VSEGEI Publ., 553 p. (In Russ.)
3. Glaznev V.N., Mints M.V., Muravina O.M. (2016). Density modeling of the Earth’s crust of the Central part of the East European Platform. Vestnik KRAUNTs. Nauki o zemle, 29(1), pp. 52–63. (In Russ.)
4. Ladovskii I.V., Martyshko P.S., Tsidaev A.G., Kolmogorova V.V., Byzov D.D. (2023). Lithosphere Density Model of the Middle Urals Segment. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 59(2), pp. 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1069351323020088
5. Martyshko P.S., Ladovskiy I.V., Fedorova N.V., Byzov D.D., Tsidaev A.G. (2016). Theory and methods of integrated interpretation of geophysical data. Yekaterinburg: IGF UrO RAN, 94 p. (In Russ.)
6. Martyshko P.s., Ladovskii I.V., Byzov D.D., Tsidaev A.G. (2018). Gravity Data Inversion with Method of Local Corrections for Finite Elements Models. Geosciences, 8(10), 373. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8100373
7. Martyshko P., Ladovskii I., Byzov D. (2021). Parallel algorithms for solving inverse gravimetry problems: Application for Earth’s crust density models creation. Mathematics, 9(22), 2966. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9222966
8. Martyshko P.S., Tsidaev A.G., Kolmogorova V.V., Ladovskii I.V., Byzov D.D. (2022). Velocity and density cross sections of the upper part of the lithosphere within the north Urals segment. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 58(3), pp. 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1069351322030041
9. Novoselitskiy V.M. (1965). On the theory of determining changes in density in a horizontal reservoir using gravity anomalies. Izv. AN SSSR. Fizika Zemli, 5, pp. 25–32. (In Russ.)
10. Nurmukhamedov A.G., Sidorov M.D., Moroz Yu.F. (2020). Model of the deep structure of the earth’s crust and upper mantle in the area of the Karymshinsky gold ore cluster based on geophysical data (Southern Kamchatka). Georesursy = Georesources, 22(1), pp. 63–72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2020.1.63-72
11. Petrov G.A., Zhiganov A.A., Stefanovskiy V.V., Shalaginov V.V., Petrova T.A., Ovchinnikov R.A., Gertman T.A. (2011). State geological map of the Russian Federation. Scale 1:100000 (third generation). Ural series. Sheet O-41 – Yekaterinburg. Explanatory letter. St. Petersburg: VSEGEI Cartographic Factory, 492 p. (In Russ.)
12. Puchkov V.N. (2010). Geology of the Urals and the PreUrals (current issues of stratigraphy, tectonics, geodynamics and metallogeny). Ufa, 279 p. (In Russ.)
13. Rybalka A.V., Petrov G.A., Kashubin S.N., Yukhlin K. (2006). Middle Ural transect ESRU. Structure and dynamics of the lithosphere of Eastern Europe. Results of research under the EUROPROBE program. Moscow: GEOKART: GEOS, pp. 390–401. (In Russ.)
14. Rybalka A.V. (2015). Seismogeological model of the earth’s crust of the Middle Urals (based on materials from the Middle Ural transect). Cand. geol. and min. sci. diss. Yekaterinburg: USGU, 137 p. (In Russ.)
15. Serbulenko M.G. (1966). Linear methods for separating potential fields. Gravity and magnetic prospecting course (special chapters). Ed. E.E. Fotiadi. Novosibirsk, pp. 389–457. (In Russ.)
16. Sharov N.V., Bakunovich L.I., Belashev B.Z., Zhuravlev V.A., Nilov M.Yu. (2020). Geological-geophysical models of the crust for the White Sea region. Geodynamics & Tectonophysics, 11(3), pp. 566–582. https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2020-11-3-0491
17. Sidorov M.D., Nurmukhamedov A.G. (2022). Three-dimensional image of crustal density model: a case study in South Kamchatka. Russian geology and geophysics, 63(10), pp. 1189–1206. https://doi.org/10.2113/rgg20204328
18. Sobolev I.D., Avtoneev S.V., Belkovskaya R.P., Petrova T.Yu., Syutkina R.A. (1986). Tectonic map of the Urals, scale 1:1000000 (explanatory note). Sverdlovsk: Uralgeology, 168 p. (In Russ.)
19. Vodolazskaya V.P., Teterin I.P., Kirillov V.A., Luk’yanova L.I. et al. (2015). State geological map of the Russian Federation. Scale 1:100000 (third generation). Ural series. Sheet O-40 – Perm. Explanatory letter. SPb.: VSEGEI Cartographic Factory, 497 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Martyshko P.S., Byzov D.D., Osipova A.Yu. Model of the structure of the Earth’s crust and Upper Mantle along the Middle Ural transect (Based on the results of Volumetric seismic Density Modeling). Georesursy = Georesources. 2024;26(4):144-152. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2024.4.3