Preview

Georesources

Advanced search

Study of the Influence of Well Operation Parameters of a Carbonate Reservoir Oil Formation on the Coefficient of Productivity Using Statistical Methods of Analysis

https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2024.4.10

Abstract

Well productivity index is one of the most important indicators for the development of carbonate reservoirs of oil fields, control and maintenance of high values of which determines the levels of hydrocarbon production. Determination of the complex influence of geological and technological factors on production capabilities of wells remains an actual direction of research in the field of oil producing. The present paper is devoted to improving the efficiency of production wells in a carbonate reservoir oil deposit based on the results of evaluation and consideration of the relationship between the productivity index and geological and field parameters such as reservoir pressure, bottomhole pressure, skin-factor, gas-oil ratio, water cut, using statistical methods of analysis. At the stage of preparation of initial data the materials of hydrodynamic and production-geophysical studies performed on the wells during the whole period of development of oil reservoir of one of the fields of Perm region were involved. The analysis of the obtained data sample with the use of statistical methods allowed us to study the relationships between the specific well productivity index and the considered geological and production parameters. Multivariate statistical models were developed using stepby-step regression analysis, collectively demonstrating the predominant influence of bottomhole pressure, reservoir pressure and water cut on the specific well productivity index based on the frequencies of occurrence of parameters and the order of their inclusion in the model. The study of the dynamics of changes in the accumulated multiple correlation coefficient during the development of statistical models allowed us to identify the ranges (areas) of change in the values of the specific well productivity index, which are characterized by individual correlations with geological and production parameters described by the corresponding mathematical dependencies. The developed models are characterized by high quality, which is confirmed by their statistical evaluations when comparing forecast and factual values of specific well productivity index. The criteria of applicability of models for conditions of carbonate reservoirs of oil fields are formed. The results of the study can be used for justification and regulation of technological modes of well operation, planning programs of optimization measures.

About the Authors

V. A. Novikov
Perm National Research Polytechnic University
Russian Federation

Vladimir A. Novikov – Cand. Sci. (Technical Sciences), Senior Researcher, Department of Oil and Gas Technologies.

29 Komsomolskiy av., Perm, 614990



D. A. Martyushev
Perm National Research Polytechnic University
Russian Federation

Dmitriy A. Martyushev – Dr. Sci. (Technical Sciences), Professor, Department of Oil and Gas Technologies.

29 Komsomolskiy av., Perm, 614990



References

1. Al-Kabbawi F.A.A. (2024). Simple pseudo-steady state productivity index correlations for infinite-conductivity horizontal wells based on a rigorous, semi-analytical model. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 233, 212534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212534

2. Al-Rbeawi S. (2019). Integrated deterministic approaches for productivity index of reservoirs depleted by horizontal wells and undergone multiphase flow conditions. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 64, pp. 152–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2019.01.024

3. Al-Rbeawi S., Kadhim F. (2017). The impact of hydraulic flow unit & reservoir quality index on pressure profile and productivity index in multisegments reservoirs. Petroleum, 3(4), pp. 414–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2017.05.004

4. Al-Rbeawi S., Kadhim F.S. (2020). Practical solution for stabilized pseudo-steady state productivity index of multiple vertical wells depleting closed reservoirs. Petroleum, 6(1), pp. 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2018.10.002

5. Al-Rbeawi S. (2018). The optimal reservoir configuration for maximum productivity index of gas reservoirs depleted by horizontal wells under Darcy and non-Darcy flow conditions. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 49, pp. 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2017.11.012

6. Bakhitov R.R. (2019). Application of machine learning algorithms in tasks of well productivity index forecasting for carbonate oil fields. Neftyanoe Khozyaystvo = Oil industry, 9, pp. 82–85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24887/0028-2448-2019-9-82-85

7. Borkhovich S.Yu., Natarov A.І. (2018). The effect of geological and physical conditions upon production well efficiency. Neft’. Gaz. Novatsii, 7, pp. 28–30. (In Russ.)

8. Davletbakova L.A., Gabitova S.I., Klimov V.Yu., Shuvaev D.V., Edelman I.Ya., Shmidt S.A. (2021). A new method for monitoring wells productivity index dynamics. PROneft, 6(2), pp. 33–38. (In Russ.)

9. Dorfman M.B., Tufanova O.P. (2019). Influence of the created drawdowns during wells operation on the productivity coefficient change in carbonate reservoirs. Equipment and technologies for oil and gas complex, 4 (112), pp. 52–57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33285/1999-6934-2019-4(112)-52-57

10. Dyachkov A.A., Galimov R.G., Fufaev S.A. (2023). The effect of bottomhole pressure reduction below saturation pressure on the productivity coefficient in conditions of low-permeable reservoirs of the tyumen formation on the example of the Shaimskiy district deposit. Geology, geophysics and development of oil and gas fields, 10(382), pp. 42–48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33285/2413-5011-2023-10(382)-42-48

11. Filippov е.V., Zakharov L.A., Martyushev D.A., Ponomareva I.N. (2022). reproduction of reservoir pressure by machine learning methods and study of its influence on the cracks formation process in hydraulic fracturing. Journal of Mining Institute, 258, pp. 924–932. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2022.103

12. Galkin V.I. Koltyrin A.N. (2019). Research and analysis of methods for determining the efficiency of application of the proppant hydraulic fracturing. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering, 330(11), pp. 50–58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2019/11/2347

13. Galkin V.I., Martyushev D.A., Ponomareva I.N., Chernykh I.A. (2021). Developing features of the near-bottomhole zones in productive formations at fields with high gas saturation of formation oil. Journal of Mining Institute, 249, pp. 386–392. https://doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2021.3.7

14. Galkin V.I., Ponomareva I.N., Chernykh I.A., Filippov E.V., Chumakov G.N. (2019). Methodology for estimating downhole pressure using multivariate model. Neftyanoe Khozyaystvo = Oil industry, 1, pp. 40–43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24887/0028-2448-2019-1-40-43

15. Grachev S.I., Zemtsov Yu.V., Semenenko A.F., Akinin D.V. (2022). Study of the influence of the mobility of a two-phase flow in the reservoir of the lower neokomian subformation on the decrease in the productivity index. Neftyanoe Khozyaystvo = Oil industry, 2, pp. 85–87. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24887/0028-2448-2022-2-85-87

16. Hagoort J. (2008). Stabilized well productivity in double-porosity reservoirs. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 11, pp. 940–947. https://doi.org/10.2118/110984-PA

17. Hagoort J. (2011). Semisteady-state productivity of a well in a rectangular reservoir producing at constant rate or constant pressure. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 14, pp. 677–686. https://doi.org/10.2118/149807-PA

18. He M., Yang Q., Asteris P.G., Zhao Q. (2025). A comparative study of three types of strength criteria for rocks. Rock Mechanics Letters, 2(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.70425/rml.202501.8

19. Hu J., Zhang C., Rui Z., Yu Y., Chen Z. (2017). Fractured horizontal well productivity prediction in tight oil reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 151, pp. 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.12.037

20. Hui G., Chen Z., Wang Y., Zhang D., Gu F. (2023). An integrated machine learning-based approach to identifying controlling factors of unconventional shale productivity. Energy, 266, 126512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126512

21. Huseynov R., Babayev J., Sadikoglu K., Azizov E., Ismayilova F. (2017). Water breakthrough effect on well productivity and skin factor change. SPE Annual Caspian Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE-189033-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/189033-MS

22. Jia J., Li D., Wang L., Fan Q. (2024). Novel Transformer-based deep neural network for the prediction of post-refracturing production from oil wells. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 13(2), pp. 119–131. https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2024.08.06

23. Kozubovsky A.G., Kuzmina T.V. (2022). The impact of development of reservoir on well productivity. PROneft, 7(2), pp. 32–40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51890/2587-7399-2022-7-2-32-40

24. Levchenko I.S., Kagan K.G., Levchenko V.S., Ermolovskiy A.V., Protasova S.A., Smolyanskaya O.A. (2023). Experience of estimation of operational object production characteristics by applying hydrodynamic and geochemical methods. Geology, geophysics and development of oil and gas fields, 10(382), pp. 57–65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33285/2413-5011-2023-10(382)-57-65

25. Liu W., Chen Z., Hu Y., Xu L. (2023). A systematic machine learning method for reservoir identification and production prediction. Petroleum Science, 20(1), pp. 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2022.09.002

26. Lysenko V.D. (2009). On the regularity of decrease in the oil productivity index of wells. Neftepromyslovoe delo = Oilfield Engineering, 5, pp. 8–10. (In Russ.)

27. Martyushev D.A. (2020). Rock stress state influence on permeability of carbonate reservoirs. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University, Geo Assets Engineering, 331(8), pp. 24–33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2020/8/2765

28. Martyushev D.A. (2021). Experimental study of the influence of bottomhole pressure of producing wells on reserve production from complicated carbonate reservoirs. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University, Geo Assets Engineering, 332(5), pp.110–119. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2021/5/3190

29. Martyushev D.A., Zaytsev R.A. (2019). Influence of oilfield reef carbonate reservoir petrophysical parameters of tournasian-famennian deposits in upper Kama on well productivity. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University, Geo Assets Engineering, 330(11), pp.77–85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2019/11/2350

30. Maschio C., Schiozer D.J. (2023). A new procedure for well productivity and injectivity calibration to improve short-term production forecast. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 229, 212105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212105

31. Mukhametshin V.Sh. (2011). Estimation of reservoir productivity factor based on indirect data at the stage of working out initial design documents. Neftegazovoe delo=Petroleum Engineering, 9(3), pp. 11–12. (In Russ.)

32. Mukhametshin V.Sh., Kuleshova L.S., Safiullina A.R. (2021). Grouping and determining oil reservoirs in carbonate reservoirs by their productivity at the stage of geological exploration. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering, 332(12), pp. 43–51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2021/12/2982

33. Naik S., You Zh., Bedrikovetsky P. (2018). Productivity index enhancement by wettability alteration in two-phase compressible flows. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 50, pp. 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2017.11.007

34. Nwanwe Ch.C., Duru U.I., Anyadiegwu Ch., Ekejuba A.I.B. (2023). An artificial neural network visible mathematical model for real-time prediction of multiphase flowing bottom-hole pressure in wellbores. Petroleum Research, 8(3), 370–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptlrs.2022.10.004

35. Ponomareva I.N., Galkin V.I., Martyushev D.A. (2021). Operational method for determining bottom hole pressure in mechanized oil producing wells, based on the application of multivariate regression analysis. Petroleum Research, 6(4), pp. 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptlrs.2021.05.010

36. Poplygin V.V., Wiercigroch M., Pavlovskaia E.E. (2016). Forecasting changes of the wells productive coefficients for the bashkirian-serpukhovian deposits in the north of the Perm region. Neftyanoe Khozyaystvo = Oil industry, 10, pp. 78–81. (In Russ.)

37. Popov S.N., Chernyshov S.E., Gladkikh E.A. (2022). Influence of sandstone reservoir deformations during bottomhole and reservoir pressure decreasing on the permeability and well productivity changes. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering, 333(9), pp. 148–157. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2022/9/3640

38. Ramah Sh.G., Othman M.A., Nouh A.Z., El-Kwidy T. (2022). Prediction of fold-of-increase in productivity index post limited entry fracturing using artificial neural network. Petroleum Research, 7(2), pp. 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptlrs.2021.09.002

39. Riabokon E.P., Turbakov M.S., Gladkikh E.A., Kozhevnikov E.V., Guzev M.A. (2024). Restoration of Rock Permeability Degraded by Well Killing Fluid Using Ultrasonic Vibrations: Experimental Studies. Georesursy = Georesources, 26(1), pp. 118–126. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2024.1.10

40. Shcherbakov A.A., Khizhnyak G.P., Galkin V.I. (2019). Prediction of sidetrack wells productivity index (on example of the Unvinskoe field). Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering, 330(5), pp. 93–99. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18799/24131830/2019/5/272

41. Sokotushchenko V.N. (2023). Determination of specific coefficients of productivity and flow rate of a group of wells, taking into account the heterogeneity of a reservoir bottom-hole zone. Geology, geophysics and development of oil and gas fields, 3(375), pp. 41–45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33285/2413-5011-2023-3(375)-41-45

42. Tang Y., Yildiz T., Ozkan E., Kelkar M. (2002). Effects of formation damage and high-velocity flow on the productivity of perforated horizontal wells. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE-77534-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/77534-MS

43. Wen Sh., Wei B., You J., He Y., Xin J., Varfolomeev M.A. (2023). Forecasting oil production in unconventional reservoirs using long short term memory network coupled support vector regression method: A case study. Petroleum, 9(4), pp. 647–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2023.05.004

44. Zakirov N.N., Alexandrov V.M., Yagafarov A.K., Spasibov V.M., Popova Zh.S. (2023). To the question of accuracy of evaluation of the productivity factor of low-production wells. Neftegazovoe delo=Petroleum Engineering, 21(2), pp. 6–16. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17122/ngdelo-2023-2-6-16

45. Zhang G., Tan Z, Zhang G., Li D., Liu Ch., Zhang Zh., Cao J., Lei X. (2024). A multi-mineral model for predicting petrophysical properties of complex metamorphic reservoirs: Case study of the Bozhong Depression, Bohai Sea. Energy Geoscience, 5(3), 100271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engeos.2023.100271

46. Zhang M., Nguyen K., Wang Zh.-Q., Ayala L.F. (2023). Flowback and early-time production modeling of unconventional gas wells using an improved semi-analytical method. Petroleum Science, 20 (6), pp. 3441–3449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2023.06.003


Review

For citations:


Novikov V.A., Martyushev D.A. Study of the Influence of Well Operation Parameters of a Carbonate Reservoir Oil Formation on the Coefficient of Productivity Using Statistical Methods of Analysis. Georesursy = Georesources. 2024;26(4):187-199. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2024.4.10

Views: 718


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1608-5043 (Print)
ISSN 1608-5078 (Online)